| Values |
Categories |
N |
| 0 |
Good party, the best party |
0 |
|
| 1 |
Tautological answer: want to support party |
0 |
|
| 2 |
Desire for change |
0 |
|
| 3 |
Good politics |
0 |
|
| 4 |
The best for the country |
1 |
|
| 5 |
Duty |
0 |
|
| 6 |
Trust/distrust generally |
0 |
|
| 7 |
Democracy/rights |
0 |
|
| 8 |
Election campaign/appearances on TV/Radio |
0 |
|
| 9 |
Process of elimination |
0 |
|
| 10 |
Idealistic reasons |
0 |
|
| 11 |
Party's ideas or what they stand for |
1 |
|
| 13 |
Moderate party, stable |
0 |
|
| 14 |
Socialist position |
0 |
|
| 15 |
Bourgeois or liberal position |
0 |
|
| 16 |
Party plan |
0 |
|
| 17 |
Female candidates |
0 |
|
| 18 |
Against Socialism/Communism |
0 |
|
| 19 |
Other ideological answer |
0 |
|
| 20 |
Party's policies |
0 |
|
| 21 |
Economic policies |
1 |
|
| 22 |
Tax policies |
0 |
|
| 23 |
Expense policies |
0 |
|
| 24 |
Social policies |
0 |
|
| 25 |
Common market policies |
0 |
|
| 26 |
Labor market policies |
0 |
|
| 27 |
Environmental policy |
1 |
|
| 28 |
Education policy |
1 |
|
| 29 |
Other specific policy |
0 |
|
| 30 |
Governs/has governed well |
0 |
|
| 31 |
New government |
0 |
|
| 32 |
General trust for party |
0 |
|
| 33 |
Dynamism/action |
0 |
|
| 34 |
Trust in candidate/s |
0 |
|
| 35 |
Sympathy for bourgeois politicians |
0 |
|
| 36 |
Positive towards Poul Schlyter |
1 |
|
| 37 |
Negative towards Poul Schlyter |
0 |
|
| 38 |
Positive towards Pia Kjaersgaard |
0 |
|
| 39 |
Other concerning administrative abilities |
0 |
|
| 40 |
Benefits us |
0 |
|
| 41 |
Best for workers |
0 |
|
| 42 |
Pensioners |
0 |
|
| 43 |
Business owners |
0 |
|
| 44 |
Farmers |
0 |
|
| 45 |
Social class situation or living standard |
0 |
|
| 46 |
German minority's party |
0 |
|
| 47 |
Poor/weakest in society |
1 |
|
| 49 |
Other groups mentioned |
0 |
|
| 50 |
Have always voted that way, habit, usually vote that way |
0 |
|
| 51 |
Reference to environment |
0 |
|
| 52 |
Grown up with it |
0 |
|
| 53 |
Particularly working class home |
0 |
|
| 54 |
Convinced by spouse |
0 |
|
| 55 |
Supporter of party |
0 |
|
| 58 |
Stable parliament, government |
0 |
|
| 59 |
Other references to childhood |
0 |
|
| 60 |
Defense policy |
2 |
|
| 61 |
NATO policy |
0 |
|
| 62 |
Pro-NATO |
0 |
|
| 63 |
Anti-NATO |
0 |
|
| 64 |
Disarmament |
0 |
|
| 65 |
Foreign policy |
0 |
|
| 66 |
Educational policy |
0 |
|
| 67 |
Wage policy |
0 |
|
| 68 |
Refugee- and immigrant-policy |
0 |
|
| 69 |
Christian position, ethical position |
0 |
|
| 70 |
For social democracy |
0 |
|
| 71 |
Against social democracy |
0 |
|
| 72 |
Negative towards Auken |
0 |
|
| 73 |
Positive towards non-liberal politics |
0 |
|
| 74 |
Positive towards Mimi Stilling Jacobsen |
0 |
|
| 75 |
Ensure liberal majority |
0 |
|
| 76 |
Topple liberal government |
0 |
|
| 79 |
Dissatisfied with previous parties |
0 |
|
| 80 |
Party's stability/trustworthiness |
0 |
|
| 81 |
Party's cooperation, responsibility |
1 |
|
| 82 |
Cooperation across aisle |
0 |
|
| 83 |
Broad government |
0 |
|
| 84 |
Put things in order, clean things up |
1 |
|
| 86 |
Big party, have influence |
0 |
|
| 91 |
Concerned about wasted vote |
0 |
|
| 92 |
Other specific answers |
0 |
|
| 93 |
Ridiculous election, fool people |
0 |
|
| 94 |
No one worth voting for |
0 |
|
| 95 |
Ineligible to vote |
0 |
|
| 97 |
Decline |
0 |
|
| 98 |
Don't know |
0 |
|
| 99 |
Unknown |
992 |
| 100 |
Question not asked |
2186 |